After all the disaster stories, I thought I’d try to find something positive to say about grinder pumps. I didn’t have to look far. You can visit the Environmental One website for case studies of their successful installations, so I won’t examine them here. But I will try to invision some typical situations where they are appropriate.
Some grinder pump history
Grinder pumps are not a new, unproven technology. They have been in residential use since the 1960’s and today there are dozens of pump manufacturers and several companies that market residential grinder pump packages. E/One appears to be the largest with “over 500,000 in daily use”. They claim to be the first to use them in residential systems in 1968. Other well known names are Myers, Flygt, and Zoller (I can’t find any info on the ABS pump packages). So it’s safe to say that there are literally over a million residential grinder pumps in use today.
So, where should we use them?
E/One recommends them for use in”flat, wet, rocky, hilly terrain” and ABS Piranha tells us that typical applications for these pumps are “houses in scattered settlements… or where large ground undulations are present”. I’m not sure about “flat terrain”, but the other conditions sound reasonable. Another situation would be a small cluster of lakefront (or beachfront) homes, perhaps seasonal vacation homes, where there is an adjacent sewer system (gravity or vacuum) above the site elevation. The utility (or individual user) installs grinder pumps to push the wastewater uphill into the gravity system and then on to the treatment facility. This would seem to be a reasonable solution to an isolated problem.
Where vacuum (or gravity) is not feasible due to extreme elevation differences or other aspects of the topography, the addition of a few grinder pumps is a viable alternative.
Economic Considerations
If a community does not have (and does not want) a taxing authority, a system of grinder pumps would be a simple way to finance a sewer system. The residents provide the capital required by purchasing and installing their own individual pumps. The operation, maintenance, and replacement costs also fall on the users. This appears to be the situation in Westtown, Pa. (These folks are in a pickle: the DEP has mandated an approved sewer system and they don’t have the $40,000 per lot to install a gravity system. The residents are being asked to pay out-of-pocket $10-11,000 each for grinder pumps). With a user financed de-centralized system, wastewater is then pumped to a nearby treatment plant and their sewer problems are solved.
How about our 216 homes in N-3?
I cannot come up with any aspect of our neighborhood that would make us a good candidate for a system of grinder pumps. If we fit any of the categories above, grinder pumps, with all of their inherent disadvantages, might be the best overall system… but we don’t. We are not a small lakefront community. Our terrain is not rocky or hilly, and our community of homes is not a “scattered settlement”. And we certainly don’t lack a taxing authority. We have a functioning Utilities Dept. and an adequate number of connections to make a vacuum system feasible. The decision point seems to be projected cost… we’ll see about that in January 2013.